Re: Mid cycle release? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Mid cycle release? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4509C652.3000007@commandprompt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Mid cycle release? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Mid cycle release?
Re: Mid cycle release? |
List | pgsql-hackers |
No one would expect Oracle to install Oracle and walk away. We are not MySQL, nor MS Access. > I can definitely see where you're coming from, it's a sort of tough-love > scenario. There are legitimate counter arguments, though. The most > obvious is that anyone who *does* evaluate their needs properly > shouldn't have too much trouble turning it off, whereas there are lots > of small database users out there who find having to set up a vacuum > cron a pain. Example: I'm in the process of setting up a typo blog, > using postgresql of course, but the database setup was secondary to the > main thing that I was doing, and I'd completely forgotten about setting > up a cron. Now I'm unlikely to produce blog posts at a rate that will > cause the database to grow out of the "minuscule" range, but it should > still be done, right? > > I have to ask, what's wrong with lazy users? Software which allows you > to be lazy gives you a warm tingly feeling, and you install it on your > intranet server when no-one's looking. We want people to think of > postgresql that way. > > There are lots of MySQL specific pieces of software out there that > started out as some guy/girl with a PHP and MySQL type of book. We can't > turn that clock back, but making postgresql easier for the masses has to > be a good thing for its adoption. The native win32 port is the poster > child for this. It was a big PR win, no? > > I would argue that leaving autovacuum off is only justifiable if we feel > that it's going to be a bad choice for the majority of users. Many of > the users who frequent postgresql lists understand the trade-off, but > the ones that we're trying to attract don't. Is it better for them to > discover manual vacuums when they're trying to incrementally improve > performance (with the risk that they never discover them at all), or > when their database is running like a dog because they've never vacuumed > it at all? > > One solution might be to turn it on in turn-key solutions: linux distro > RPMs, Win32 installer (is it on there already?) etc, but leave it turned > off in the source release. Would that help you, or are your clients > using RPMs or whatever? > > Cheers > > Tom > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
pgsql-hackers by date: