On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> As Tom pointed out, you can do the same with naming conventions by having scripts \i each other as appropriate.
>
> This is a deprecated idea, though. We're talking about the
> pg_execute_from_file() patch that has been applied, but without the
> pg_execute_sql_file() function. So that part is internal to the backend
> extension code and not available from SQL anymore.
>
> There's no consensus to publish a bakend \i like function. So there's
> no support for this upgrade script organizing you're promoting. Unless
> the consensus changes again (but a commit has been done).
To be clear, consensus was not reached, by my reading. It may be that it makes sense to restore pg_execute_sql_file(),
perhapsto run only in the context of ALTER EXTENSION.
Just to be clear where I'm coming from, as an extension developer, I would like PostgreSQL extensions to:
* Prefer convention over configuration
* Not make me do more work that the computer can do
Best,
David
