BATBAATAR Dorjpalam <htgn.dbat.95@gmail.com> writes:
> I am sending a sample program to reproduce the this phenomenon.
Thank you for the reproducer! (For anyone following along at home,
it doesn't fail for me with the suggested "-i 200 -u 200" parameters,
but it does fail in most runs with "-i 1000 -u 200".)
After some playing around, I figured out that the trouble scenario
is like this:
* We have a bunch of data pending to be sent, and we try to pqFlush()
it. OpenSSL returns SSL_WANT_WRITE, and since we're in nonblock mode
we just accept the failure-to-write and continue on.
* The app provides a bit more data to be sent, and we get to
pqPutMsgEnd(), which does this:
if (conn->outCount >= 8192)
{
int toSend = conn->outCount - (conn->outCount % 8192);
if (pqSendSome(conn, toSend) < 0)
return EOF;
/* in nonblock mode, don't complain if unable to send it all */
}
Because of rounding toSend down to an 8K multiple, we are asking
OpenSSL to send less than the previous pqFlush call asked to send.
That violates the SSL_write() API, and at least some of the time
it results in SSL_R_BAD_LENGTH.
As a quick cross-check I've been running with
diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.c b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.c
index c14e3c95250..75593ef0f72 100644
--- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.c
+++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ pqPutMsgEnd(PGconn *conn)
if (conn->outCount >= 8192)
{
- int toSend = conn->outCount - (conn->outCount % 8192);
+ int toSend = conn->outCount;
if (pqSendSome(conn, toSend) < 0)
return EOF;
and that seems to prevent the failure.
The SSL_write docs say that you should not either increase or
decrease the length during a repeat call after SSL_WANT_WRITE,
but that seems to be a lie: increasing the length doesn't cause
any problems. (We do use SSL_MODE_ACCEPT_MOVING_WRITE_BUFFER,
and perhaps that affects this?)
For a real fix, the narrowest answer would be to not round down
toSend if we are using an SSL connection. I wonder though if
the round-down behavior is of any use with GSSAPI either, or
more generally if it's sensible for anything except a Unix-pipe
connection.
regards, tom lane