Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I would be far more interested in this patch if it avoided needing
> SysV shmem at all. The problem is to find an adequate substitute for
> the nattch-based interlock against live children of a dead postmaster.
>
>
(confused) Why can't you use mmap of /dev/zero and inherit the fd into
child processes?
(simple enough to do something similar on Win32, even if the mechanism
isn't identical)
