Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Ugh. Isn't there some sort of pragma or similar we can use to shut
> it up?
If that fails, maybe use some function like the below? That would
also have the advantage of not relying on assumptions beyond the
documented API, which I tend to feel good about no matter how sure I
am that the implementation details upon which I'm relying won't
change.
No claims that this is good final form, especially when it comes to
using ssize_t, but just trying to get across the general idea:
void
write_completely_ignore_errors(int filedes, const void *buffer, size_t size)
{ size_t t = 0; while (t < size) { ssize_t n = write(filedes, buffer, size - t); if (n <= 0)
break; t += n; }
}
-Kevin
