Re: License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose - Mailing list pgsql-admin
From | Chris Browne |
---|---|
Subject | Re: License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose |
Date | |
Msg-id | 603c7wr0k5.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info Whole thread Raw |
In response to | License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose ("Eric Yum" <eric.yum@ck-lifesciences.com>) |
Responses |
Re: License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose
Re: License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose |
List | pgsql-admin |
eric.yum@ck-lifesciences.com ("Eric Yum") writes: > I am a developer of one commercial organization. We are going to > develop some applications with PostgreSQL 7.3.3. I learn from some > websites that it cost no charge for developing software with > PostgreSQL in commercial environment. However, I saw the PostgreSQL > is under two type of licenses, namely, X11-style license and BSD > license for the following websites, :p> > > http://www.postgresql.org/licence.html:p> > > http://www.gnu.org/directory/database/servers/postgresql.html:p> > > Please kindly provide professional comment on this issue and suggest > whether the use of PostgreSQL for commercial purpose is no license > charge or not :p> What you are observing is that the Free Software Foundation (who hold the gnu.org domain) felt a need to write up their own interpretation of what they feel various licenses mean. The FSF characterizes the PostgreSQL license as being "an X11 style license." They felt a need to distinguish between different variations of licenses that are called 'BSD licenses.' The FSF web site then compares various variations on "BSD licenses," considering that there are some that they deem to be "free" (in their terms), and that there are others that they deem to _NOT_ be "free" (again in their terms). None of that establishes that there is actually more than one license under which you can obtain PostgreSQL; it merely indicates that the FSF felt the need to use a different name for the license. There aren't two licenses; there's just one. And it allows you to use PostgreSQL for whatever purpose you like without imposing any licensing fees. I also find it quite curious that you intend to deploy applications with a version of PostgreSQL that is known to have bugs fixed by later releases. The fact that version 7.3.6 has been released should be clearly interpreted as indicating that there were problems with all preceding versions, and that users are to be encouraged to upgrade to that version. Furthermore, 7.4.2 has been released, offering substantial performance and other functionality advantages over the 7.3 series. It would seem odd to start developing applications with a version that has already been (arguably) superceded by a new major release. -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="acm.org" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];; http://cbbrowne.com/info/linux.html Rules of the Evil Overlord #130. "All members of my Legions of Terror will have professionally tailored uniforms. If the hero knocks a soldier unconscious and steals the uniform, the poor fit will give him away." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
pgsql-admin by date: