On 29.10.25 21:19, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>
>> On 29 Oct 2025, at 17:54, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
>>>> On 25.10.25 00:26, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>>> While hacking on this it seemed like a good idea to move to using progname
>>>> consistently, and reduce scope in some places from global variables, but
>>>> looking at it now I'm less convinced. At the very least it should be ripped
>>>> out into its own patch but for now those changes are left in there.
>>
>>> The --version outputs intentionally do not use progname, so that you get
>>> a proper identification of the program and version independent of what
>>> the binary might be called. Please don't change that.
>
> All callsites using handle_help_version_opts were already using progname for —version, this just made it consistent.
Thatbeing said, I can change it to be consistent in the other direction.
AFAICT, handle_help_version_opts() does this correctly: It takes an
argument fixed_progname that is used for --version output, while for the
--help output it uses argv. And most callers provide a fixed string for
fixed_progname, but I see that some don't.
>> Hmm, that's important institutional knowledge that should be captured
>> somewhere.
>
> Maybe a README in src/bin?
Maybe just a better code comment at handle_help_version_opts().
