On Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 08:44:55AM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 8:17 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Thanks, that looks sensible.  I'll revisit what you have at the
>> beginning of next week (local Tuesday) with a backpatch down to v13 in
>> mind.  If others have comments and/or objections, please feel free to
>> chime in.
>
> It's an oversight. Thanks for catching it.
Phew, done.  While looking at the whole thing, I was wondering if we
should strengthen a little bit what's expected of the context for some
of the callers of the WAL routines, like XLogShutdownWalRcv(), and
finished with the bonus patch attached.  What do you think?
--
Michael