HI,
On Jul 26, 2023, at 20:50, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
Hi Michael,
That was more a question. I was wondering if it was something you've
noticed while working on a different patch because you somewhat
assigned incorrect values in the syscache array, but it looks like you
have noticed that while scanning the code.
Oh, got it. That's correct.
Still it's hard to miss at compile time. I think that I would remove
this one.
Fair enough. Here is the updated patch.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
<v2-0001-Check-more-invariants-during-syscache-initializat.patch>
LGTM.
```
- Assert(cacheinfo[cacheId].reloid != 0);
+ Assert(cacheinfo[cacheId].reloid != InvalidOid);
```
That remind me to have a look other codes, and a grep search `oid != 0` show there are several files using old != 0.
```
.//src/bin/pg_resetwal/pg_resetwal.c: if (set_oid != 0)
.//src/bin/pg_resetwal/pg_resetwal.c: if (set_oid != 0)
.//src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_tar.c: if (oid != 0)
.//src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_custom.c: while (oid != 0)
.//src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_custom.c: while (oid != 0)
```
That is another story…I would like provide a patch if it worths.
Zhang Mingli
https://www.hashdata.xyz
