Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 12:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So really we have to find some way to only expend one XID per failure,
>> not one per row.
> I discovered a few days back that ~550 subtransactions is sufficient to
> blow max_stack_depth. 1 subtransaction per error doesn't allow many
> errors.
I assume you are talking about 550 nested levels, not 550 sequential
subtransactions, so that doesn't seem particularly relevant.
regards, tom lane
