> On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 at 12:22, George MacKerron <george@mackerron.co.uk> wrote:
>> I know the documentation has now been changed to reflect that ‘system’ actually means OpenSSL.
>
> I didn't realize that. I'm definitely not in favor of that doc change.
> It's describing behaviour that I believe is incorrect, as if it's
> actually intended.
The change was described in Daniel’s message on 3 April. It’s actually a bit subtler than I suggested. The diff is:
The special value <literal>system</literal> may be specified instead, in
- which case the system's trusted CA roots will be loaded.
+ which case the trusted CA roots from the SSL implementation will be loaded.
I agree with you here: the change makes the docs more correct, but the correctly-documented behaviour itself still
seemsincorrect to me.
I think a clue is that the word ‘system’ no longer appears in the updated version of text explaining what
sslrootcert=systemdoes!
