Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected
Date
Msg-id 694CB417-EF2C-4760-863B-AEC4530C21E3@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave asexpected
List pgsql-hackers
On Sep 21, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:.
> I think giving an error message like "hash indexes are not WAL-logged
> and .." for unlogged tables doesn't seem like a good behavior.

+1. This seems like deliberate behavior, not a bug.

...Robert


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ICU locales and text/char(n) SortSupport on Windows
Next
From: "Jim Van Fleet"
Date:
Subject: Fw: [HACKERS] HACKERS[PATCH] split ProcArrayLock into multiple parts --follow-up