Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
Date
Msg-id 7345e39f-982a-130f-91a4-3d487e5de08c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/06/17 16:51, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Here's a patch doing what I suggested above.  The second patch addresses
>> an independent oversight where the post alter hook was invoked before
>> doing the catalog update.
> 
> 0002 is a slam-dunk.  I don't object to 0001 but haven't reviewed it carefully.
> 

I did go over the code (ie didn't do actual testing), and I like it much
better than the current state. Both in terms of making the behavior more
consistent and the fact that the code is simpler.

So +1 to go ahead with both patches.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken)
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table