Re: pgNixInstaller: Making PostgreSQL relocatable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John DeSoi
Subject Re: pgNixInstaller: Making PostgreSQL relocatable
Date
Msg-id 7586828F-BCA0-45B0-B0B0-AFED609718F8@pgedit.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgNixInstaller: Making PostgreSQL relocatable  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mar 24, 2006, at 7:25 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

> Anyway, looking at the manpage of otool it doesn't say that it just
> prints the raw name, so perhaps it's doing the same as ldd. To be sure
> you'd need to strings the binary to see what it says.

Yes, strings shows the full path of prefix provided to configure. And  
I can tell you from experience it is not relocatable :).

Here is a bug I recently filed for pgAdmin which discusses the use of  
install_name_tool to make the reference relative. Certainly it would  
be better if they could be compiled with relative references, but at  
least I found a solution without having to understand gcc.

http://www.pgadmin.org/archives/pgadmin-support/2006-03/msg00053.php


John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pgedit.com/
Power Tools for PostgreSQL



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared memory
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Role incompatibilities