On 4/21/05, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de> wrote:
> * Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > Yeah, I was actually thinking about a two-step process: inline the
> > function to produce somethig equivalent to a handwritten scalar
> > sub-SELECT, and then try to convert sub-SELECTs into joins.
>
> ... back to my original question ...
>
> What kind of query should I use ?
> Is a join better than a function ?
It appears that JOINs are usually faster. So if performance is an
important issue, go with JOIN (and VIEWs probably). Functions are nicer
(in terms off look and feel).
Regards,
Dawid
