Re: C11 / VS 2019 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: C11 / VS 2019
Date
Msg-id 839151.1748959318@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C11 / VS 2019  (Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> Will it mean we can implement atomics in term of C11 atomics?

Any such change would have to be supported by extensive performance
testing to verify that there's not a regression on any supported
platform.  Yeah, it'd be cool if we could rip out a lot of that
code, but we aren't going to just rip on faith.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: MergeAppend could consider sorting cheapest child path
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Incremental Sort Cost Estimation Instability