Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Adding the expected length to the error message might be OK though.
> Certainly seems like we should do at least that much. The current
> message is just wrong, right?
It's incomplete, for sure. Doesn't mention nulls either.
regards, tom lane