Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"
Date
Msg-id 935421.1605643162@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Adding the expected length to the error message might be OK though.

> Certainly seems like we should do at least that much. The current
> message is just wrong, right?

It's incomplete, for sure.  Doesn't mention nulls either.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback
Next
From: Jack Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql feature request: shorthand for argument and local variable references