Download strategy - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Dave Page |
---|---|
Subject | Download strategy |
Date | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10809180058i7ae8bf63i5851a3d4fe391fb4@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Download strategy
Re: Download strategy Re: Download strategy Re: Download strategy |
List | pgsql-www |
I must say I'm a little disappointed about the current discussion on how the downloads are currently organised. The current layout was discussed with numerous members of the webteam, both on and off-list before it was implemented, and was done so based on feedback from users and third parties who were able to provide useful hints through their own dealings with users and potential users. The original download area was confusing. We had links on the homepages that pointed to source code and windows binaries. We had multiple pages linking to related projects, and we had a download page that linked into parts of our FTP site, as well as a largely unmanaged list of third party sites. We regularly received emails asking where/what people needed to download. The revised strategy included a number of ideas to improve matters: - *All* external download links should point to /download, except where intentionally pointing to a specific package. - Browsing of the FTP area should be a last resort for the user, never something we direct them to do. - All third-party products and add-ons etc. should be moved into the new software catalogue. - All third party 'non-community-standard' PostgreSQL distributions (e.g. Postgres Plus, BitNami, Bizgres) would be moved to a secondary list under the main server downloads. - 'Community standard' PostgreSQL distributions would be given top-most listing on the download page, categorised by operating system. These packages come from postgresql.org and a variety of third party sites. - Within each operating system category, downloads would be listed in order of ease of use for the complete novice and then alphabetically. This is because it was perceived that the majority of 'what do I download' questions came from the real novices, for whom a one-click installer is easier to understand than a long list of RPMs, DEBs or ports, most of which they won't need. The more experienced users will naturally choose the platform-native packages anyway, as that's what they will be looking for. And guess what? It's worked. *All* the feedback I've received has commented on how it's far, far easier to find the appropriate downloads now, and since the changes were implemented, I don't think I've seen a single 'what/where do I download' email. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com