Re: postgresql-archive.org - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Subject | Re: postgresql-archive.org |
Date | |
Msg-id | 9e047087d2b308028a5037b0d2ce2273@postgresql.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: postgresql-archive.org (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>) |
Responses |
Re: postgresql-archive.org
|
List | pgsql-www |
On 2018-08-23 01:12, Steve Atkins wrote: >> On Aug 22, 2018, at 12:08 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I kinda wonder if the postgres community shouldn't do something about >> http://www.postgresql-archive.org/. The name makes it sound somewhat >> official, but it doesn't appear to be. At least I do not know who >> runs >> it. Does somebody else? > > There are lots of domains that contain "postgresql", most of which > contain postgresql-related content and which aren't operated by > PGDG. > >> >> Given the, presumed, unofficial nature I'm not really ok with them >> serving ads while benefiting from an official sounding name. >> >> But even without that issue, I think there's two reasonable concerns: >> For one, we do not know how reliable the operator is. They could be >> manipulating e.g. attachements to contain maliscious contents. The >> second, and more likely, issue is that it's likely that the offering >> will cease to exist and the links in our archive will point into the >> void. > > There are two entities involved. The archiving is being done by > nabble.com, > which is what they do. They do it quite well, though I find their > advertising > overly aggressive and crappy, even for an advertising backed service. > > And there's the person who requested Nabble archive our lists and > pointed postgresql-archive.org at it. (They may be one and the same, > but it really doesn't matter). > > Neither of them is doing anything wrong. They're, between them, > providing > a service we don't. > > If "we" wanted them to stop archiving "our" lists then I'm sure nabble > would > stop if asked (or the nabble bot could be unsubscribed). The main thing > that would do would be to remove a service some people find useful. > > Making our archives more useful so that nabble provides no added value > does seem like a more productive first step. In the meantime, would it be optimal for us to try and get that postgresql-archive host to remove the sleazy ads? From a slightly different angle, maybe if we set up some kind of "official" Nabble thing instead - without any ads or sleazy crap - which we could point to instead? (not sure if this is even possible, it's just a concept) If that would work, then the postgresql-archive place wouldn't be providing a useful unique service to our Community any more, so we could direct them towards shutting down or focusing on some other project down. Thoughts? :) + Justin