Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikh+XAs8Ph5RwtzJPLo_bVc8w5LwDDEStQjEQd5@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Kevin Grittner
> <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>> Maybe the thing to focus on first is the oft-discussed "benchmark
>> farm" (similar to the "build farm"), with a good mix of loads, so
>> that the impact of changes can be better tracked for multiple
>> workloads on a variety of platforms and configurations.  Without
>> something like that it is very hard to justify the added complexity
>> of an idea like this in terms of the performance benefit gained.
>
> A related area that could use some looking at is why performance tops
> out at shared_buffers ~8GB and starts to fall thereafter.

Under what circumstances does this happen?  Can a simple pgbench -S
with a large scaling factor elicit this behavior?

Cheers,

Jeff


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature proposal: distinguish each PostgreSQL instance in the event log
Next
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: When and where do PG invoke PLs module?