On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Ranga Gopalan
<ranga_gopalan@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It seems that this is an issue faced by others as well - Please see this
> link:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2236776/efficient-querying-of-multi-partition-postgres-table
>
> Is this a known bug? Is this something that someone is working on or is
> there a known work around?
I think that we know this problem exists, but I'm not aware anyone is
working on fixing it. There is a "Merge Append" patch floating around
out there that I think might help with this, but AFAICS it was last
updated on July 5, 2009, and still needed some more work at that time.
Since this is an all-volunteer effort, complicated problems like this
don't always get fixed as fast as we'd like; most of us have to spend
most of our time on whatever it is that our employer pays us to do.
Of course if you're in a position to sponsor a developer there are a
number of companies that will be happy to work with you.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
