Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=hOsATw52DZ+zC-xMz=ag-Gc=eqg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I don't think that the way I've phrased my error messages is
> inconsistent with that style guide, excepty perhaps the pipe()
> reference, but if you feel it's important to try and use "could not",
> I have no objections.

I  like Fujii's rephrasing - we don't usually mention the name of the
system call.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding Japanese README
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: how to call the function--pqCatenateResultError()