On Jun 16, 2006, at 6:28 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> I never understood why disk caches on the order of megabytes are
> exciting. Why
> should disk manufacturers be any better about cache management than OS
> authors?
>
> In the case of RAID 5 this could actually work against you since
> the RAID
> controller can _only_ use its cache to find parity blocks when
> writing.
> Software raid can use all of the OS's disk cache to that end.
IIRC some of the Bizgres folks have found better performance with
software raid for just that reason. The big advantage HW raid has is
that you can do a battery-backed cache, something you'll never be
able to duplicate in a general-purpose computer (sure, you could
battery-back the DRAM if you really wanted to, but if the kernel
crashed you'd be completely screwed, which isn't the case with a
battery-backed RAID controller).
The quality of the RAID controller also makes a huge difference.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
