Re: remaining sql/json patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: remaining sql/json patches
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqG39p+WxwNq35BECZgZr=ZzgMgcB38FEaR-mfCKWjyoVg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: remaining sql/json patches  ("Shinoda, Noriyoshi (HPE Services Japan - FSIP)" <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 6:36 PM Shinoda, Noriyoshi (HPE Services Japan
- FSIP) <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you for developing such a great feature. The attached patch formats the documentation like any other function
definition:
> - Added right parenthesis to json function calls.
> - Added <returnvalue> to json functions.
> - Added a space to the 'expression' part of the json_scalar function.
> - Added a space to the 'expression' part of the json_serialize function.

Thanks for checking and the patch.  Will push shortly.

> It seems that the three functions added this time do not have tuples in the pg_proc catalog. Is it unnecessary?

Yes.  These are not functions that get pg_proc entries, but SQL
constructs that *look like* functions, similar to XMLEXISTS(), etc.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: unrecognized node type while displaying a Path due to dangling pointer
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition