Re: sudo inconsistencies in download pages - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Dave Page
Subject Re: sudo inconsistencies in download pages
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxoz1m9jNu-pkB=D0PVT+teDZENtW4vBkccR5ByVgahbe7Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sudo inconsistencies in download pages  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: sudo inconsistencies in download pages
List pgsql-www


On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:09 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:53 AM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/30/20 1:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> >> The new download pages that generate "copy/paste scripts" include sudo
>> >> in the instructions for debian and ubuntu, but not for redhat and
>> >> centos. That seems inconsistent :) We should probably be consistent
>> >> there, or is there a particular reason not to be?
>> >
>> > Can't see a reason not to include it on the Red Hat side.
>>
>> +1. Doing a scan of other projects, it seems to be acceptable to include
>> "sudo" as part of providing installation instructions.
>
>
> Does sudo work out of the box on CentOS/RHEL 6? Otherwise I don't see a problem with it.

It doesn't necessarily work out of the box on Debian or Ubuntu either,
it depends on what your starting point is.

For example, any of the minimal images that are popular these days
because of containers won't have sudo on debian, ubuntu *or* centos.
Whereas I think most/all cloud images do.

AFAIK it's in the default "standard" installs on RedHat since 7. For
Debian since 9. I believe Ubuntu has had it longer.

I think it's in the standard install on CentOS/RHEL 6, I just can't remember if it works out of the box for members of the wheel group or similar - which now you come to mention it, is the case on Debian 9/10, but not Ubuntu (and I'm pretty sure, not CentOS/RHEL 7+).
 

Maybe the fact that container images don't have it would actually be
an argument to remove it from the debian instructions rather than add
it to the redhat ones. But our target with these specific instructions
are probably more the "traditional server installs" anyway?

I would definitely say that should be the case - most people won't do their own container installs anyway, and those tend to be quite different anyway, as most containers won't be running systemd.

For the "most likely to work following a standard OS install" option, I think we probably should add sudo for CentOS/RHEL 7+, and remove if from the Debian 9/10 instructions.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: sudo inconsistencies in download pages
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: sudo inconsistencies in download pages