Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYS8QOURhv8tjZ=mTQ+QMH6w1E1NUVrxfbamLd2USSxog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken
Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Greg Fausak" <greg@named.com> writes:
>> Here is the bug when trying to use the two together with a rule to bind
>> them:
>
>> create rule "_RETURN" as on select to X do instead select * from Y;
>
> Creating rules on inheritance children isn't supported, and you should
> not hold your breath waiting for it to be.
>
> We probably ought to have something in there to throw an error ...

Probably not for rules in general, but we shouldn't let people turn
tables into views if they are involved in table inheritance, as either
a parent or a child.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #6281: need to remove
Next
From: Greg Fausak
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken