Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ721J=7kbpRZEBB=rKo7JE8KTh8O8vXapo-teTVYKwDg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 2:34 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> If I add an unlikely around if (rechdr->xl_rmid == RM_XLOG_ID), the
> performance does improve. But that "only" brings it up to 322.406. Not sure
> what the rest is.

I don't really think this is worth worrying about. A sub-one-percent
regression on a highly artificial test case doesn't seem like a big
deal. Anybody less determined than you would have been unable to
measure that there even is a regression in the first place, and that's
basically everyone.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text
Next
From: Michał Kłeczek
Date:
Subject: Re: FDW LIM IT pushdown