On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> If we're going to go the ad-hoc route, there seems little reason to be
> considering a core patch at all. Freestanding checkers could just as
> well be independent projects.
I completely agree. I think there is little reason to be considering
a core patch. I haven't seen any convincing evidence (or any evidence
at all) that being able to fling checkers at a large number of
functions written in different procedural languages is an important
use case for anyone. I think the vast majority of checking will get
done one function at a time; and therefore we are gilding the lily.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
