Re: [HACKERS] Remove 1MB size limit in tsvector - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Remove 1MB size limit in tsvector
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZyu5JTQOb_4tZgzTR1DPnBRojskMED48pC5riHF4_1SQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Remove 1MB size limit in tsvector  (Ildus Kurbangaliev <i.kurbangaliev@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Remove 1MB size limit in tsvector
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
<i.kurbangaliev@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Moreover, RUM index
> stores positions + lexemes, so it doesn't need tsvectors for ranked
> search. As a result, tsvector becomes a storage for
> building indexes (indexable type), not something that should be used at
> runtime. And the change of the format doesn't affect index creation
> time.

RUM indexes, though, are not in core.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning