Re: Declarative partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Declarative partitioning
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaECzhafZ8-yGeis=4ubq8aMWL2cbaD0eOp6G_2LpEN9w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Declarative partitioning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I think setting up N ResultRelInfos in advance where the tuple would only
> ever require one might be superfluous. But that may point to some flaw in
> my original design or thinking about the case.

You have a point.  But maybe we should get it working first and
optimize it later.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive