On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Thomas Munro
>> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Thomas Munro
>>> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>> Here's a new version to apply on top of dsa-v7.patch.
>>>
>>> Here's a version to go with dsa-v8.patch.
>>
>> All right, so I've committed this, but not before (1) renaming some
>> things that you added, (2) adding documentation for the new LWLock
>> tranche, (3) not creating the DSA in the "simulated DSM using
>> backend-private memory" case, and (4) some cosmetic tweaks.
>
> Thanks! Hmm, so now in rare circumstances we can finish up running
> ExecXXXInitializeDSM, but later have estate->es_query_dsa == NULL.
> This is something to be careful about.
Yes.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
