Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check existency of table/schema for -t/-n option (pg_dump/pg_res - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check existency of table/schema for -t/-n option (pg_dump/pg_res
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob3Jo_zi2GDkccHmhCCFtZGqZzYzaJfvZXMmJ_jeenAog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check existency of table/schema for -t/-n option (pg_dump/pg_res  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
>>      /*
>> -    * We use UNION ALL rather than UNION; this might sometimes result in
>> -    * duplicate entries in the OID list, but we don't care.
>> +    * this might sometimes result in duplicate entries in the OID list,
>> +    * but we don't care.
>>       */
>>
>> This looks totally incoherent.  You've removed the thing to which the
>> word "this" referred and replaced it with nothing.
>
>
> Oops.
>
>     /*
>      * The loop below runs multiple SELECTs might sometimes result in
>      * duplicate entries in the OID list, but we don't care.
>      */
>
> looks reasonable?

Sure, that seems fine.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: cache type info in json_agg and friends
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: GiST support for UUIDs