Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKX_t9fnts8yfckaRP5AhqcjXkhcYFoEw+pCrJe5ryz=w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 3:13 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> There is a cc.sizeof(), which I guess should be enough to report the
> size of off_t, and fail if we try a size larger than 4GB for the
> segment file when a 4-byte off_t is detected.

(It's signed per POSIX and on Windows so I assume you meant to write 2GB here.)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: transformJsonFuncExpr pathspec cache lookup failed
Next
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Assertion failure in SnapBuildInitialSnapshot()