Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Date
Msg-id aQ1oRQg663qDSZ5h@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 03:56:07PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 3:13 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> There is a cc.sizeof(), which I guess should be enough to report the
>> size of off_t, and fail if we try a size larger than 4GB for the
>> segment file when a 4-byte off_t is detected.
>
> (It's signed per POSIX and on Windows so I assume you meant to write 2GB here.)

Yes, right..
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Assertion failure in SnapBuildInitialSnapshot()
Next
From: Quan Zongliang
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_role_ddl() functions for role recreation