On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 6:20 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> So I don't think this code is correct. AFAICT, there is nothing right
> now that can possibly define HAVE_MBSTOWCS_L on Windows/MSVC. Was that
> the intention?
Yes, that was my intention. Windows actually doesn't have them. The
autoconf/MinGW test result was telling the truth. Somehow I had to
make the three build systems agree on this. Either by strong-arming
all three of them to emit a hard-coded claim that it does, or by
removing the test that produces a different answer in different build
systems. I will happily do it the other way if you insist, which
would involve restoring the meson.build and Solultion.pm kludges you
quoted, but I'd also have to add a compatible kludge to configure.ac.
It doesn't seem like an improvement to me but I don't feel strongly
about it. In the end, Solution.pm and configure.ac will be vaporised
by lasers, so we'll be left with 0 or 1 special cases. I don't care
much, but I like 0, it's nice and round.
