Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLeuew_njG+TixgPiVzAyYizGR_9V-d+B8Z6zz-j56chQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 7:14 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> The patch seems harmless enough to me, no objections to committing it.

Thanks!

> However, I'm worried that we'll soon break it again. The new rule is
> apparently "include libpq first", but we have no way of enforcing it.

Hmm, my meson-fu is weak, but there must surely be some way to declare
that you want libpq and have it automatically put things in the right
order, will look into that...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: display hot standby state in psql prompt
Next
From: Alastair Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_plan_advice