Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date
Msg-id CA+q6zcU615Gq1qt1Z2HNHDFFWS5je1DtsuOvAYeHw1XjCOpFHw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
List pgsql-hackers
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:34 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 02:18:09PM +0100, Daniel Verite wrote:
> > There's a batch mode for pgbench in a patch posted in [1],
> > with \beginbatch and \endbatch commands, but nothing
> > for psql AFAICS.
> > psql is more complicated because currently it uses a
> > blocking PQexec() call at its core. Craig mentioned psql
> > integration in [2] and [3].
>
> This patch has been around for some time now, the last version fails to
> apply cleanly and in-depth reviews have happened.  I am moving that to
> the next CF, waiting on its author.

Unfortunately, nothing was changed since then, so there is already some amount
of unaddressed review feedback. I'll move this patch to "Returned with
feedback".


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager