Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Facebook
Downloads
Home
>
mailing lists
Re: [HACKERS] type cache for concat functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From
Dmitry Dolgov
Subject
Re: [HACKERS] type cache for concat functions
Date
June 18, 2017
01:50:50
Msg-id
CA+q6zcX9=zD1-edrAni_4HXPL-PbjYDeYFdxD2-CEojdr0Pq9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Raw
In response to
[HACKERS] type cache for concat functions
(Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses
Re: [HACKERS] type cache for concat functions
List
pgsql-hackers
Tree view
> On 20 May 2017 at 10:03, Pavel Stehule <
pavel.stehule@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> Now concat is 2x times slower than || operator. With cached FmgrInfo for
> output function it will be only 5%.
Looks nice and does what's expected (what else one may need from a Saturday
evening). I just can mention that from what I see the previous version of
`concat` is slower the more arguments are getting involved, so looks like it
can be more than 2x.
Also, it was a little bit confusing to see that the function `concat` behaves
differently from operator `||` in terms of performance. When you're looking at
the code it's becoming obvious, but I couldn't find any mention about that in
the documentation.
pgsql-hackers
by date:
Previous
From:
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
18 June 2017, 01:27:25
Subject:
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths
Next
From:
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
18 June 2017, 02:03:48
Subject:
Re: [HACKERS] Typo in planstats.sgml
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
I confirm that I have read and accepted PostgresPro’s
Privacy Policy
.
I agree to get Postgres Pro discount offers and other marketing communications.
✖
×
×
Everywhere
Documentation
Mailing list
List:
all lists
pgsql-general
pgsql-hackers
buildfarm-members
pgadmin-hackers
pgadmin-support
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-docs
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jdbc
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-odbc
pgsql-patches
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-pkg-debian
pgsql-pkg-yum
pgsql-ports
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
pgsql-testers
pgsql-translators
pgsql-www
psycopg
Period
anytime
within last day
within last week
within last month
within last 6 months
within last year
Sort by
date
reverse date
rank
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to
Privacy Policy
.
I accept cookies