Re: shmem_startup_hook called twice on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sami Imseih
Subject Re: shmem_startup_hook called twice on Windows
Date
Msg-id CAA5RZ0umz=q7QX1MoDUuz=uuhoc79x5Ec99Vv31kHKae1oTX2Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: shmem_startup_hook called twice on Windows  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: shmem_startup_hook called twice on Windows
List pgsql-hackers
> I quickly put together a patch for the stuff we've discussed in this
> thread.  WDYT?
>
> --
> nathan

I still think we need to mention EXEC_BACKEND somehow.
The way it's done in [0], it says "On Windows (and anywhere else
where EXEC_BACKEND is defined)"

So we do have precedent of mentioning EXEC_BACKEND in docs,
and it’s clearer than the ambiguity of saying
'on some builds'/'in other builds'.


[0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/bgworker.html

--
Sami



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: shmem_startup_hook called twice on Windows
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?