On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 04:31:43PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> I still think we need to mention EXEC_BACKEND somehow. The way it's done
> in [0], it says "On Windows (and anywhere else where EXEC_BACKEND is
> defined)"
>
> So we do have precedent of mentioning EXEC_BACKEND in docs, and it’s
> clearer than the ambiguity of saying 'on some builds'/'in other builds'.
Added in v2.
--
nathan