Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Melanie Plageman |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAAKRu_bkaOTdnuTw73Mf5A1ZSq5ZMcmHBvZr29ivwpaSVsvgWw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) (Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Responses |
Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 3:41 AM Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On 05.04.2023 03:41, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 4:35 PM Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > > >> After a little thought... I'm not sure about the term 'bootstrap > >> process'. I can't find this term in the documentation. > > There are various mentions of "bootstrap" peppered throughout the docs > > but no concise summary of what it is. For example, initdb docs mention > > the "bootstrap backend" [1]. > > > > Interestingly, 910cab820d0 added "Bootstrap superuser" in November. This > > doesn't really cover what bootstrapping is itself, but I wonder if that > > is useful? If so, you could propose a glossary entry for it? > > (preferably in a new thread) > > I'm not sure if this is the reason for adding a new entry in the glossary. > > >> Do I understand correctly that this is a postmaster? If so, then the > >> postmaster process is not shown in pg_stat_activity. > > No, bootstrap process is for initializing the template database. You > > will not be able to see pg_stat_activity when it is running. > > Oh, it's clear to me now. Thank you for the explanation. > > > You can query pg_stat_activity from single user mode, so it is relevant > > to pg_stat_activity also. I take your point that bootstrap mode isn't > > relevant for pg_stat_activity, but I am hesitant to add that distinction > > to the pg_stat_io docs since the reason you won't see it in > > pg_stat_activity is because it is ephemeral and before a user can access > > the database and not because stats are not tracked for it. > > > > Can you think of a way to convey this? > > See my attempt attached. > I'm not sure about the wording. But I think we can avoid the term > 'bootstrap process' > by replacing it with "database cluster initialization", which should be > clear to everyone. I like that idea. diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml index 3f33a1c56c..45e20efbfb 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml @@ -991,6 +991,9 @@ postgres 27093 0.0 0.0 30096 2752 ? Ss 11:34 0:00 postgres: ser <literal>archiver</literal>, <literal>startup</literal>, <literal>walreceiver</literal>, <literal>walsender</literal> and <literal>walwriter</literal>. + The special type <literal>standalone backend</literal> is used I think referring to it as a "special type" is a bit confusing. I think you can just start the sentence with "standalone backend". You could even include it in the main list of backend_types since it is possible to see it in pg_stat_activity when in single user mode. + when initializing a database cluster by <xref linkend="app-initdb"/> + and when running in the <xref linkend="app-postgres-single-user"/>. In addition, background workers registered by extensions may have additional types. </para></entry> I like the rest of this. I copied the committer who most recently touched pg_stat_io (Michael Paquier) to see if we could get someone interested in committing this docs update. - Melanie
pgsql-hackers by date: