Hi Robert, could you try with "exists" ?SELECT c.* FROM contacts cWHERE exists ( SELECT 1 FROM phone p WHERE p.addr =? and p.contact_id=c.id )OR exists (SELECT 1 FROM email e WHERE e.addr = ? and e.contact_id=c.id );2013/11/21 Robert DiFalco <robert.difalco@gmail.com>I have found this:SELECT c.* FROM contacts cWHERE c.id IN ( SELECT p.contact_id FROM phone p WHERE p.addr = ? )OR c.id IN (SELECT e.contact_id FROM email e WHERE e.addr = ? );To have a worse plan than:SELECT * FROM contacts where id IN (( SELECT c.id FROM contacts c JOIN phone p ON c.id = p.contact_id AND p.addr = ? UNIONSELECT c.id FROM contacts c JOIN email e ON c.id = e.contact_id AND e.addr = ? );Maybe this is no surprise. But after discovering this my question is this, is there another option I dont' know about that is logically the same that can perform even better than the UNION?
I have found this:SELECT c.* FROM contacts cWHERE c.id IN ( SELECT p.contact_id FROM phone p WHERE p.addr = ? )OR c.id IN (SELECT e.contact_id FROM email e WHERE e.addr = ? );To have a worse plan than:SELECT * FROM contacts where id IN (( SELECT c.id FROM contacts c JOIN phone p ON c.id = p.contact_id AND p.addr = ? UNIONSELECT c.id FROM contacts c JOIN email e ON c.id = e.contact_id AND e.addr = ? );Maybe this is no surprise. But after discovering this my question is this, is there another option I dont' know about that is logically the same that can perform even better than the UNION?
pgsql-performance by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных