Re: BUG #18092: Unexpected Result by enable_seqscan - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David Rowley
Subject Re: BUG #18092: Unexpected Result by enable_seqscan
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvrGABU272MSLFVn0nirf_7HuJttYsJay-ij=GCa8WAD1w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18092: Unexpected Result by enable_seqscan  (Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 19:35, Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 09:10, PG Bug reporting form
> > SET enable_seqscan=on;
> > SELECT DISTINCT ON (v0.c0) t0.c0 FROM v0, t0; -- {0.8}
> > SET enable_seqscan=false;
> > SELECT DISTINCT ON (v0.c0) t0.c0 FROM v0, t0; -- {0.1}
>
> This seems a variation of your previous report. To me your queries
> looks like you are asking Pg to "give me any row from this sets" and
> then complaining when it does not give you the same under different
> conditions.

Yeah, I agree. This seems documented in [1]:

"Note that the “first row” of each set is unpredictable unless ORDER
BY is used to ensure that the desired row appears first."

David

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-select.html#SQL-DISTINCT



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: query pg_stat_ssl hang 100%cpu
Next
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: BUG #18055: logical decoding core on AllocateSnapshotBuilder()