On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 at 03:26, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> Not objecting. I think the original Valgrind integration refrained from this
> because it would have added enough Valgrind client requests to greatly slow
> Valgrind runs. Valgrind reduced the cost of client requests in later years,
> so this new conclusion is reasonable.
I tested that. It's not much slowdown:
time make installcheck
Unpatched: real 79m36.458s
Patched: real 81m31.589s
I forgot to mention, I pushed the patch yesterday.
David
