On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
>> Thanks. For comparison, I wrote a patch to implement what I had in mind.
>>
>> When a WAL-skipping COPY begins, we add an entry for that relation in a
>> "pending-fsyncs" hash table. Whenever we perform any action on a heap that
>> would normally be WAL-logged, we check if the relation is in the hash table,
>> and skip WAL-logging if so.
>
> I think this wasn't applied, was it?
No, it was not applied.
--
Michael
