On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> This is a *much* more expensive approach though. Doing the fsync
> directly after modifying the file. One file by one file. Will usually
> result in each fsync blocking for a while.
>
> In comparison of doing a flush and then an fsync pass over the whole
> directory will usually only block seldomly. The flushes for all files
> can be combined into very few barrier operations.
Hm... OK. I'd really like to keep the run of pg_rewind minimal as well
if possible. So here you go.
--
Michael
