On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> I have committed a fix for this, mainly using your patch. In the end I used
> the same pattern for handling the case that we use in the one-argument form
> of the function, i.e. we just drop through to the end, skipping over the
> part where we add object elements.
Thanks. I have hesitated with your solution, looks like I was on the
wrong side at the end :)
--
Michael