On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Needs Review -> Needs Review > Waiting on Author -> Refuse moving > Ready for committer -> Ready for Committer > Committed -> refuse moving > Moved to next cf -> refuse moving (if it's already set like this, it would > probably be a bug) > Returned with feedback -> Refuse moving > Which basically means we only move things that are in needs review or ready > for committer state, and that we never actually change the status of a patch > in the moving. > > Is that a correct summary?
Yes, thanks for the summary. It looks like this is what people would expect based on what I read here.
