Re: New archives for testing - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Subject | Re: New archives for testing |
Date | |
Msg-id | CABUevExzm+Nv1WDJEx0LssfA9dBzPfGueVjgwgLGbwk=c44j4Q@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: New archives for testing (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Responses |
Re: New archives for testing
|
List | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> >> On Sunday, December 30, 2012, Tom Lane wrote: >>> >>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> >> The prompt isn't shown on all browsers, so we should stick it on the >>> >> website somewhere too. >>> >>> > Ugh, that's annoying. >>> >>> > Do you think we can get away without putting it next to every single >>> > link? Because I'm not sure how we can do that without making it look >>> > like crap. But if we don't, are people likely to ever read it? >>> >>> How big a problem is this? When I checked, both Safari and Firefox >>> showed the prompt. If there are just a few little-used browsers that >>> fail to show it, I'm not convinced that we have to clutter the pages >>> for everybody to cater to them. I can think of more than a few other >>> sites where that prompt is pretty damn essential for usability, so >>> I would argue that a browser that doesn't show it is broken anyhow. >> >> >> I don't think it was originally intended as a prompt (it's the security >> realm actually), but most browsers showed it anyway and it's been (ab)used >> that way for years. FYI, the browser I saw not displaying it was Safari on >> iOS, so most definitely not 'little used'. > > No, but not showing it makes it a pretty useless browser since it's > supposed to tell the user which password to use when different > sections on a site has different passwords. > > That said, it doesn't matter how stupid or useless it is, if it's > reality :) We just have to deal with it. I'm not too worried about > iphone users - i doubt either the raw or the mbox view is very > interesting to them. Same for mbox users on iPad - however, I can > certainly see iPad users who want to get the raw view. > > Right now, mobile is about 1.2% of our visitors to the archives. > Safari on ios 0.5%. iPhone is just over 0.3% and iPad just over 0.3%. > > So it's a very small portion of our visitors. While the total numbers > are likely going up, I'm not sure those who actually want the raw > and/or mbox files are going to go up. > > FWIW, it works fine in Chrome (46%), Firefox (36%) and Safari-desktop > (3%). Unverified at this point are IE (11%) and Opera(2%), the rest > are really far down the list. > > So the question is how much effort we want to put into it. If we make > the 401 page itself contain the text, does that show up in safari > after authentication has failed, or does it show some custom page? ads just confirmed it works on IE as well. --Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/