On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello Masahiko-san,
>
>>> ISTM that you probably intended "\(.*\)" (actual parenthesis) instead of
>>> "(.*)" (memorization) in the data generation message check.
>>
>>
>> Thank you, fixed it.
>>
>>> Otherwise all is well for me.
>>>
>>
>> Attached the updated version patch.
>
>
> Applies, compiles, make check & tap test ok, doc is fine.
>
> All is well for me: the feature is useful, code is simple and clean, it is
> easy to invoke, easy to extend as well, which I'm planning to do once it
> gets in.
>
> I switched the patch to "Ready for Committers". No doubt they will have
> their own opinions about it. Let's wait and see.
Thank you for the reviewing this patch!!
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
